Wherever you are in your product development lifecycle,
Sterling can help.
Author: Indre Larson & Jeni Leberknight | Date: June 29, 2022
In the medical device field, manufacturers and regulators are constantly trying to balance the advantages of new and emerging technologies with the complex, and often lengthy, regulatory process to ensure the devices are safe and perform as they are supposed to. This impacts a variety of areas in medical device development, in everything from artificial intelligence to mobile medical devices. This issue has also come to the forefront in 3D printing of medical devices at the point of care (PoC), where the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the agency that oversees medical devices in the United States, has recently taken steps to address the issue.
3D printing in medical equipment offers many advantages for medical professionals and patients. A surgeon could use a 3D-printed replica of a patient to evaluate different surgical techniques. Using 3D printing for medical devices at the point of care means a patient can have a customized medical device in a short period of time. When the COVID-19 pandemic first hit the U.S., the health care industry quickly learned it lacked the proper inventory and safety net to overcome the supply chain disruptions brought on by the public health crisis. During this time, health care providers and facilities utilized 3D printing technology to produce face shields, face mask holders, nasopharyngeal swabs, and ventilator parts during the shortage.
The growing potential of 3D printing in medical devices and its use in point of care medical devices, especially in the aftermath of the pandemic outbreak, prompted the FDA to consider how to regulate health care facilities performing 3D printing for medical devices at the point of care. To begin the regulatory process, the FDA released its discussion paper, 3D Printing Medical Devices at the Point of Care, to outline the issue and gather feedback that will inform future guidance and policy related to PoC medical devices and 3D printing.
The FDA’s primary concerns are to ensure:
The FDA is using the discussion paper to solicit feedback on several regulatory approaches, including:
To accomplish this, the FDA outlined three potential regulatory scenarios for 3D printing for medical devices at the point of care. The first relies on the manufacturer of the 3D printer to assume regulatory compliance responsibilities. The second requires the health care facility to partner with a traditional device manufacturer operating at or near the facility that would be responsible for FDA compliance. And the third places the regulatory obligation on the health care facility itself. Since the discussion paper does not provide specific policies at this time, we will continue to monitor its process to be able to provide our clients with the most current advice on point of care devices. One of the benefits of working with Sterling is that we provide both engineering and regulatory support for medical device development. If our medical device design services can help you get your device to market, please contact us.
February 24, 2018
February 18, 2021
November 23, 2020